which sexist vintage ad is most horrifying?

Posted on July 14th, 2010

Sexist ads…they’re often passed off as being funny (don’t you femmos get the bloody joke?!?), like this current Lynx one (which was not approved, NOT because it objectified women, but because the perving boys aren’t wearing seatbelts!). The makers tried to claim it was funny. Me, I can’t find the joke anywhere.

The below, featured on Vintage Ads, show us, not so much how far we’ve come, but perhaps where it all started…

001dzhwc

vintageads1suffrage1912vintage-pants-trouser-ad-from-the-7

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Jess says:

    Definitely the last one is the most offensive, although the one about women voting is also terrible.

    As for the lynx ads, they’re disgusting and repulsive.

    July 14th, 2010 at 9:49
  • Robbie says:

    Gross gross gross. Laughing at vintage ads generally hides the fact that nothing has changed since the 1960s and that advertising essentially still works in the same way, as the Lynx ad attests. The sad fact is that it serves to remind me of all the people I have had to work with for whom these ads represent not a ‘quirky period of nostalgia’ but instead are a preferred way of life.

    July 14th, 2010 at 10:14
  • Rosie Kalber says:

    Hey Sarah,

    Some food for thought.

    Are these Ads rehashed as more of a time capsule than anything else? Amusing due to how different and contrasting they are to our current views regarding men and women?

    I enjoy them simply for the historical significance.

    Rosie x

    July 14th, 2010 at 10:24
  • Paul says:

    “Indoors women are useful – even pleasant” – Awful, awful, awful. Sometimes it’s just plain embarassing being male.

    July 14th, 2010 at 10:47
  • Fiona says:

    *sigh* I can’t… gah… at least it’ put me off my morning tea?

    July 14th, 2010 at 11:09
  • Naomi says:

    The ad you are talking about was actually a Brut ad I think? But the Lynx ads were right up there also. There is a big difference between being ‘male’ and being a ‘male chauvinist’, but obviously some advertising companies just don’t realise!

    July 14th, 2010 at 12:27
  • Dani says:

    I can’t stop laughing at the blokes in their mountain climbing wear. The image well and truly negates the statement “Men are better than Women” (Only in your delusional knee-high-sock-wearing world, buddy!)

    July 14th, 2010 at 13:49
  • jojo says:

    What’s so bad about the Lynx ad? Men find woman attractive. Suprised?

    This isn’t shocking or exploitative, anymore than those Diet Coke commercials from the ’90’s that depicted a shirtless male construction worker oggled by female office worker. Same story. Sex sells. Get over it.

    July 14th, 2010 at 14:44
  • Amy says:

    The people that find those ads funny probably also enjoy Two and a Half Men. Utter trash.

    July 14th, 2010 at 15:20
  • lucy says:

    hahahhahahahahahahahha!!!!!!
    the vintage ads are gold!!

    the lynx ad isn’t sexist, just a bunch of guys checking out a girl
    but its definatly stupid, the whole idea of “sharing”

    July 14th, 2010 at 15:45
  • Sarah says:

    Very good point Amy!! WHO watches that show?

    July 14th, 2010 at 17:01
  • Sarah says:

    ah, it’s a subtle distinction. I don’t mind ads that depict male/female attraction. The diff b/w this ad and the Diet Coke one: women are far more vulnerable when walking semi-clad in front of ogling guys fantacising about “sharing”. Also, men aren’t traditionally defined as objects to be consumed by women.

    July 14th, 2010 at 17:02
  • Sarah says:

    totally agree!!

    July 14th, 2010 at 17:03
  • Sarah says:

    ooops

    July 14th, 2010 at 17:03
  • Sarah says:

    don’t feel responsible for all of them, Paul!

    July 14th, 2010 at 17:03
  • [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sarah wilson and alfalky. alfalky said: @_sarahwilson_ err…the one where he stands on her head!!! RT: which sexist vintage ad is most horrifying? http://bit.ly/cs4LMT [...]

    July 14th, 2010 at 17:33
  • Tim says:

    I honestly don’t get the point of digging up rubbish like this, move on ladies.

    July 14th, 2010 at 17:34
  • Dan says:

    All those ads are terrible, but they are from a different time. Hopefully we have moved on. (Hopefully!) What really annoys me is the ads showing men as morons. The ones where the man can’t operate the washing machine, so he needs his wife, who is cooking dinner while feeding the dog and changing the baby’s nappy, all at the same time, to help him out.

    July 14th, 2010 at 17:43
  • Nerissa says:

    Wow! They were incredibly offensive. the last one reminds me a bit of the Windsor Smith billboard ads that were around a few years ago. Sadly it seems not everyone has managed to move forward.

    July 14th, 2010 at 21:36
  • Gagamil12 says:

    There are some funny vintage commercials where “you show her it’s a man’s world”, but these are really degrading.

    July 14th, 2010 at 23:22
  • The last ad is the worst in my opinion. Gosh those ads are bad.
    BTW – I inboxed you about TOLETTA and Lifestyle Channel :-)

    July 15th, 2010 at 1:30
  • The first is most shocking, by far. When Mrs. serves me breakfast in bed, I NEVER wear a tie that ugly. I usually go for regimental stripes or polka-dots.

    July 15th, 2010 at 11:03
  • Michelle says:

    ouch. i’m most horrified by the first & last ones. but they’re all kinda horrible.

    July 20th, 2010 at 0:27
  • Brittany says:

    I can’t believe how far we’ve come.

    July 20th, 2010 at 14:41
  • Charlotte says:

    Wow, had not idea how sexist it was back then – so we haven’t progressed at all :(
    I find the Brut code share 85 highly sexist as well.
    But with this new porn culture and sexual liberation of women, times have changed. In the past, women would complain if construction workers whistled at them. Now, women are quite happy to dress sexy in public for men to get their attention. Well, if women want to dress like sex objects, then expect to be treated like one!
    Expect to see more of these types of ads in the future.

    August 24th, 2010 at 10:40

Leave a comment